Samsung introduced not only new smartphones on Wednesday iPhone 18 Pro, 18 Pro Max a iPhone Duo, but also smart watches Apple Watch Ultra 4. These are intended to compete directly with Samsung watches Galaxy Watch Ultra2Let's compare both watches and answer the question of which one is more worthwhile.
Design and construction
Apple Watch Ultra 4 to Galaxy Watch Ultra2 are significantly different from each other at first glance. The first one is based on the Apple traditional square shape with rounded edges, while the other uses the so-called squircle design, i.e. a rounded square case with a round display. Both watches are very durable – dýnko Apple Watch Ultra is made of ceramic and zirconium and the frame is titanium, in the case of Galaxy Watch Ultra2 Ceramic and sapphire glass were used, while the frame is also made of titanium.
Galaxy Watch Ultra2 They have the upper hand in terms of protection, meeting IP68/IP69K certification, which means they are fully dustproof and can withstand high-pressure and hot water. Apple Watch Ultra 4, on the other hand, are IP6X certified, meaning they are fully dustproof and technically more like waterproof. than Completely waterproof. Both watches are certified for diving to depths of up to 40 m and meet the military standard MIL-STD-810H.
Gallery
Display
Jak Galaxy Watch Ultra2, So Apple Watch Ultra 4 attract with high-quality OLED displays with fine resolution and high brightness. Here are their complete specifications:
Galaxy Watch Ultra2
- Diagonal: 1,52 inches
- Distinction: 498 x 498 px
- Maximal brightness: 5000 rivets
- Protection: Sapphire glass
Apple Watch Ultra 4
- Diagonal: 1,98 inches
- Distinction: 514 x 422 px
- Maximal brightness: 3000 rivets
- Protection: Sapphire glass
Gallery
Chipset and memory
Galaxy Watch Ultra2 It is powered by the new Snapdragon SW6100 chipset, which is paired with 2GB of RAM and 64GB of storage. Apple Watch Ultra 4 also use the new chip Apple The S11, which is also supported by 2 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage. Both chips boast a powerful neural unit that can process local artificial intelligence models.
Gallery
Battery and charging speed
Apple traditionally does not list the battery capacity of its watches and did not do so in the case of Apple Watch Ultra 4. It only mentions that it can last up to 50 hours on a single charge with normal use and up to 84 hours in low power mode. From 0–80 % According to the Cupertino giant, the watch can be recharged in 45 minutes.
Battery capacity Galaxy Watch Ultra2 It has a capacity of 800 mAh and our testing shows that it lasts an average of 3 days, with heavy use it lasts about 2 days. The watch is charged with 10 W, which in practice means approximately two and a quarter hours to fully charge.
Gallery
Price
Both watches represent the best that Samsung and Apple can in the area wearable to offer at the moment. This is also reflected in their price, which is nevertheless more favorable for the representative of the Korean giant.
- Apple Watch Ultra 4: 18,490 CZK / 799 dollars / 899 euros
- Galaxy Watch Ultra2: 18,490 CZK / 649 dollars / 699 euros
Gallery
Which one is more worthwhile?
When choosing between these top watches, I think they clearly have the upper hand Galaxy Watch Ultra2They offer completely comparable specifications, plus they are more durable, have a fantastic 5000 nit display, have longer battery life, and are much more affordable. The price-to-value ratio is simply better.
You might be interested in
Galaxy Watch Ultra2 They also give you an open and flexible ecosystem, while Apple locks you in your own world. With Samsung you get maximal freedom, great integration of advanced AI for fitness and sleep analysis, and even longer battery life in power saving mode. If you are looking for an uncompromising sports smartwatch that doesn't waste your budget just because of the brand, the choice from the perspective of an unbiased technology enthusiast clearly falls on the representative of the Korean giant.
You are right, the quoted text is misleading. It compares incomparable standards and draws the wrong conclusion from them.
What is misleading about the quote:
1. Mixing two different standards:
IP rating (IEC 60529): Measures dust resistance and resistance to splashes or short-term immersion to shallow depths (typically 1,5 meters for 30 minutes). Apple for models Ultra indicates IP6X, which means only the highest dust resistance. It does not indicate the second digit for water, because IP water resistance tests are for a series Ultra too weak.
ISO 22810 / EN13319 standard: Measures real-world waterproofness and water pressure resistance. Apple Watch Ultra meets the specification of 10 ATM / 100 meters and the diving standard EN13319 up to 40 meters.
2. Nonsense claim about waterproofness:
The claim that Apple Watch Ultra are "more water resistant than completely waterproof" based on the IP6X code is nonsense. This watch includes a depth gauge, a water temperature sensor and is certified as a dive computer up to 40 meters. The usual IPX8 standards do not apply to them at all nestachi.
3. The only real advantage of IP69K with Samsung:
IP69K protection indicates resistance to high-pressure hot water jets (e.g. cleaning with a pressure washer/water jet). Samsung has a specific additional certification in this regard, but this does not mean that it Apple It fell short in general waterproofness when swimming and diving.
The article thus created the false impression that Apple incorrectly or poorly sealed against water, even though Apple used stricter diving standards instead of basic telephone IP codes.
Samsung watch advertisement
Well, this article is complete nonsense :))
Samsung introduced new iPhones🫣😅