Samsung unveiled the phone last week Galaxy The S24 FE, which is powered by a slightly underclocked version of Samsung's current Exynos 2400 flagship chip, called the Exynos 2400e. Now the phone has appeared in popular benchmarks. How did you do in them?
It is confirmed that the Exynos 2400e chipset differs from the Exynos 2400 in one thing, namely the lower clock speed of the main Cortex-X4 core, which runs at 3,2 GHz instead of 3,1 GHz. The other frequencies of the processor cores are the same, i.e. they have two powerful Cortex-A720 cores running at a frequency of 2,9 GHz, three equally powerful cores "ticking" at a lower frequency of 2,59 GHz and four economical Cortex-A520 cores that are clocked at 1,96 GHz. The question is at what frequency does the Xclipse 940 graphics unit run, there may be another difference here compared to the Exynos 2400.
And how are you? Galaxy S24 FE with such a “trimmed” chipset, did it perform in benchmarks? Extremely well – in Geekbench, it scored 2146 points in the single-core test, which placed it just below Galaxy S24+ and before Pixel 9 Pro XL, and in6711 points in the multi-core test, when it again finished just below the middle model of the series Galaxy S24 and safely ahead of the top model of the range Pixel 9.
Even in 3D Mark Galaxy S24 FE passed the Wild Life Extreme test (2160p resolution) it scored 3870 points and finished just behind the new flagship Xiaomi 14T Pro and safely ahead of the S23 FE and in the Solar Bay test (1440p resolution) scored 8242 points and beat among others by a considerable margin iPhone 16 Plus and was only slightly slower than Galaxy S24 +.
You could be interested in

It follows from the benchmarks that Galaxy S24 FE is significantly faster than its predecessor, which should translate into real-world performance. So if you were worried that the S24 FE, like the S23 FE, would lag behind the top models in terms of performance, you can rest assured. The new "budget flagship" of the Korean giant will not disappoint you in this regard.